Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11433 (CAL)

SUBRATA MONDAL AND ANR v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

WP.CT/222/2023 · 2026-02-03

Partha Sarathi Sen, Sujoy Paul

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

03.02.2026 Item No.3 Ct. No.1 KS WP.CT 222 of 2023 Subrata Mondal & Anr. Vs. Union of India & Ors. Mr. Kamal Mishra ….. For the Petitioners Mr. D. N. Ray, Sr. Adv. Ms. Amrita Pandey Mr. Rajesh Kr. Shah …..For the Respondents PER, SUJOY PAUL, CJ.: 1. Counsel for petitioners, at the outset, submits that the relief claimed for, is already granted to the petitioners and they have been appointed. 2. Learned counsel for petitioners fairly submits that petition has rendered infructuous. The other side represented has no objection. 3. Accordingly, petition is dismissed having rendered infructuous. 4. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be furnished to the parties expeditiously upon compliance of all legal formalities. (SUJOY PAUL, CJ.) (PARTHA SARATHI SEN, J.)