Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010154602026 2026:GAU-AS:10502 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./1062/2026 DON MURA C/O RAJA BHASKAR, R/O HOUSE NO. 103, JOYMATI NAGAR, BYE LANE NO. 9, NEAR LIBRARY, PANDU, GUWAHATI- 781012 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND ANR REPRESENTED BY NCB 2:INSPECTOR CENTRAL BUREAU OF NARCOTICS THE PREVENTIVE AND INTELLIGENCE CELL 14A 1ST 2ND AND 3RD FLOOR ROUSE AVENUE LANE VISHNU DIGAMBER MARG NEW DELHI 11000 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR K BHUYAN, MS. M MONJURE,R K TALUKDAR,MR M HAZARIKA,MS. A AKHTAR,MR. M U E BHUYAN Advocate for the Respondent : SC, NCB, Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER 30.07.2026 Heard K. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. R. K. Dev Choudhury, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India cum Senior Counsel, assisted by Ms. L. Devi, learned counsel for the respondent. This petition, under Section 528 of the BNSS, 2023, is preferred by the petitioner, namely, Don Mura, for quashing the summon dated 16.03.2026, and subsequent summon dated 19.03.2026, issued under Section 67 of the NDPS Act, by the Inspector Central Bureau of Narcotics, the Preventive & Intelligence Cell, New Delhi. At the very outset, Mr. R. K. D. Choudhury, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India has pointed it out that the petitioner herein is residing at Dimapur, Nagaland, under the jurisdiction of Kohima Permanent Bench, and that the notice was issued to the director/proprietor of Drugs Loft Pharma and Surgical, of which, the petitioner is the proprietor; by the Inspector Central Bureau of Narcotics, the Preventive & Intelligence Cell, New Delhi, and the business establishment of the petitioner is at Dimapur and as such, the Kohima Permanent Bench of Gauhati High Court has the jurisdiction in this matter and accordingly, he submits that the petition is not maintainable here. At this point, Mr. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this petition, with liberty to approach the Kohima Permanent Bench of the Gauhati High Court. Page No.# 3/3 Accordingly, taking note of the submissions of the learned counsel for both the parties, the petitioner is allowed to withdraw this petition, with liberty to approach the appropriate forum, by filing the appropriate petition. JUDGE Comparing Assistant