27-MVXA-35-25.DOC rsk IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION MAHARASHTRA VALUE ADDED TAX APPEAL NO.35 OF 2025 The Additional Commissioner of State Tax Vat-I M S Mumbai …Appellant Versus Schindler India Pvt Ltd …Respondents Mr. Himanshu Takke, AGP for the Appellant. Mr. Vinit V. Raje a/w. Mr. Vinayak Patkar and Mr. Durgesh G. Desai for the Respondent. CORAM: SUMAN SHYAM & GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, JJ. DATED: 22nd SEPTEMBER, 2026. PC:- 1. An Interlocutory order passed by the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal, Mumbai (MSTT) has been put to challenge in this appeal. Mr. Himanshu Takke, learned AGP submits that after filing of the appeal, he has received instructions from the Department to withdraw the appeal while reserving the right of the Department to assail the impugned order, if the same still survives after the disposal of the appeal. 2. The same prayer is not opposed by the Respondents’ counsel Mr.Vinit Raje. 3. In view of the above, this appeal is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. RAJESHWARI SUBODH KARVE Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI SUBODH KARVE Date: 2026.09.28 11:13:06 +0530 27-MVXA-35-25.DOC 4. Needless to state, the questions of law, if any arising out of the impugned order are kept open to be considered in an appropriate proceedings. 5. Appeal stands dismissed. (GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.) {