$~50 & 56 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 1113/2026 SI MIN BIBHUTI BHUSAN MISHRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava, Mr. Ajinkya Dhalwade, Advs. through VC. versus SHRI GOVIND MOHAN & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ashish Goyal, SPC with Mr. Amit Acharya, GP & Dr. Anurag Singhal, Adv. for respondents. 56 + W.P.(C) 4645/2026 & CM APPL. 1938/2026 - Application for vacating/ DISCHARGING / VARYING THE INJUNCTION ORDER DATED 15.04.2025 & CM APPL. 21496/2025-Stay SIIMIN BIBHUTI BHUSANA MISHRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhay Kumar Bhargava, Mr. Ajinkya Dhalwade, Advs. through VC. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ashish Goyal, SPC with Mr. Amit Acharya, GP & Dr. Anurag Singhal, Adv. for respondents. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA O R D E R % 07.07.2026 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/07/2026 at 11:19:38 1. The writ petition bearing no. 4645/2025 was preferred by the petitioner questioning his transfer order dated 28th March 2025 whereby he was transferred to 8th BN CRPF which is positioned at Manipur. The earlier posting of the petitioner was at Srinagar before the aforesaid transfer order. 2. It is the case of the petitioner in the aforesaid writ petition that he has already suffered two hard postings and as such he is entitled for a civil posting. Based on the aforesaid, though he had approached this Court and an order was passed on 15th April 2025 thereby staying the transfer order dated 28th March 2025, the petitioner was continued at Srinagar. 3. In the interregnum, i.e., vide order dated 29th May 2026, the petitioner was promoted to the post of Inspector (Ministry). 4. It is the case of the petitioner that, post promotion, he is still entitled for posting in a civil area, particularly having regard to his earlier two hard postings in the capacity of Sub-Inspector. 5. When confronted, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents assisted by Mr. Vinod Sawant, Second-In-Command, Law Officer, CRPF states that, in case, if the petitioner makes a representation qua his aforesaid grievance, the same can be considered on its own merits without being influenced by the withdrawals of the contempt petition and that of writ petition. 6. The aforesaid proposition coming out from the respondents is not contested by the learned counsel for the petitioner as he states that within a period of 1 week from today, he shall make a detailed representation in regard to his right to be posted at civil places post promotion to the post of Inspector (Ministry). 7. As such, not only the present contempt petition but also, the writ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/07/2026 at 11:19:38 petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. 8. In case, if the petitioner makes the representation as referred to hereinabove within a period of 1 week from today, we direct the respondents that the said representation be decided and the order thereon be communicated to the petitioner within a period of 4 weeks from today. 9. It is to clarify that we have not adverted to the merits of the matter and it shall be open for the petitioner to approach the Court afresh, in case, the order is adverse to his interest. 10. Next date of hearing, i.e., 04th December, 2026, in the captioned writ petition stands cancelled. NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J AMIT SHARMA, J JULY 7, 2026/kr/ns This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/07/2026 at 11:19:38