Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11420 (KAR)

SMT. LEELA v. DAKSHANAMURTHY

MFA/4460/2025 · 2026-02-11

Jayant Banerji, T M Nadaf

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4460 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SMT.LEELA, W/O DAKSHINAMURTHY, D/O N.D.PUTTACHAR, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT NO.43, C/O RAJAKUMAR, GRUHALAKSHMI LAYOUT, NAGASANDRA POST, NELAGADARANAHALLI, BANGALORE. ...Appellant (By SRI.B.C.VIJAYAKUMARA SWAMY, Advocate) AND: DAKSHINAMURTHY, S/O PUTTACHAR, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, MUDDENAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TALUK. …Respondent This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/S 28(1) of Hindu Marriage Act, against the Judgment and Decree dated MFA.No.4460/2025 -------------------------- 2 27.02.2025 passed in M.C. No.07/2023 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Chikkanayakanahalli, allowing the petition filed U/S.13(1)(1a)(1b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following: ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the appellant is permitted two weeks and no more time to remove the office objection. Failure to remove the office objection shall result in dismissal of the aforesaid appeal without any further reference to this Court. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Court Order dt.11.02.2026 not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : MK R By : NR C By : STE