SAI KRUSHNA CHARITABLE TRUST v. STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/23620/2025 · 2026-04-24
R Devdas
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11414 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11414 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22526 WP No. 23620 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 23620 OF 2025 (KLR-RES)
BETWEEN:
SAI KRUSHNA CHARITABLE TRUST REGISTERD TRUST REGD. OFFICE AT SAI KRUSHNA MANDIR HOSADODDI VILLAGE, NELAGULI VILLAGE, UTTARAHALLI HOBLI, OFF KANAKAPURA MAIN ROAD BOLARE POST, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BANGALORE-560082 REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY K VINOD CARTIC AGED 43 YEARS …PETITIONER (BY SRI.ANIRUDH A.KULKARNI., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M.S.BUILDING, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE 560 001.
REP BY ITS SECRETARY
2.
THE SPECIAL DY. COMMISSIONER II BANGALORE SOUTH SUB DIVISION BANGALORE 560 009.
Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22526 WP No. 23620 of 2025
3.
THE ASST. COMMISSIONER BANGALORE SOUTH SUB DIVISION KANDAYA BHAVAN BANGALORE 560 009.
4.
5.
6.
7.
THE TASILDHAR BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BANGALORE 560 009.
THE REVENUE INSPECTOR NELAGULI SUB DIVISION UTTARAHALLI HOBLI BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BANGALORE-560061.
THE ASST. DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK KANDAYA BHAVANA, K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE 560 009.
THE TALUK SURVEYOR UTTARAHALLI HOBLI BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK-560061. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SHAMANTH NAIK., HCGP FOR R1 TO R4)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER 18.01.2025 PASSED BY THE R2 IN NCR (2) (S) CR 35/2024-25 PASSED IN PROCEEDINGS INITIATED U/S 67(2) OF THE KARNATAKA LAND REVENUE ACT, 1964 AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:22526 WP No. 23620 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 17.04.2026 stating that the respondent authorities have agreed to resurvey the property in question and therefore the petitioner would seek leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.
2. The memo is taken on record, subject to all just exceptions.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
KLY CT: JL