Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CR No. 79 of 2026 1 - Van Devi W/o Late Shri Asare Singh Aged About 55 Years R/o Village- Bhaisda, Tahsil- Janjgir, District Janjgir Champa(Cg) (Defendent No. 2)
... Applicant versus 1 - Pushpa Singh D/o Asare Singh Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Dondki, Tahsil- Masturi, District Bilaspur (Cg) (Plaintif No. 1) 2 - Rahul Singh S/o Late Ashok Singh Aged About 27 Years R/o Village Rishda, Thana- Masturi, District Bilaspur (Cg) (Plaintiff No. 2) 3 - Puja Singh W/o Late Ashok Singh Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Risda, Thana-Masturi, District Bilaspur (Cg) (Plaintiff No. 3) 4 - Kamla Bai D/o Asare Singh R/o Village Risda, Thana-Masturi, District Bilaspur (Cg) (Defendant No. 3) 5 - Shivendra Singh S/o Jagdish Aged About 42 Years R/o Village- Bhaisda, Tahsil- Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa(Cg) (Defendant No. 5) 6 - Bahadur Singh S/o Jagdish Aged About 45 Years R/o Village- Bhaisda, Tahsil- Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa(Cg) (Defendant No. 6) 7 - Kalyani Devi W/o Jagdish Aged About 80 Years R/o Village-Bhaisda, Tahsil- Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa(Cg) (Defendant No. 7) 8 - Paduman Kumar S/o Sukhsagar Singh Aged About 45 Years R/o Village-Bhaisda, Tahsil- Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa(Cg) (Defendant No. 8) Digitally signed by SHAYNA KADRI
2 9 - Yugal Kishor Singh S/o Sukhsagar Singh R/o Village-Bhaisda, Tahsil- Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa(Cg)(Defendant No. 9) 10 - Umashankar Singh S/o Sukhsagar Singh Aged About 60 Years R/o Village-Bhaisda, Tahsil- Janjgir, District- Janjgir-Champa(Cg)(Defendant No. 10) 11 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Janjgir-Champa (Cg) (Defendant No. 19)
... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from CIS System) For Applicant : Mr. Gajanand, Advocate
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 24/03/2026
1. Learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present civil revision with liberty to file a fresh, duly constituted revision. He further prays for a direction to return the certified copies of the documents.
2. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the applicant, the present civil revision is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
3. The Office is directed to return the certified copies of the documents, after retaining photocopies of the same as supplied by the applicant. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Shayna Judge