Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010093122026
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2523/2026 NAZMUL HOQUE S/O LATE SUKUR ALI, R/O VILL. RUPNAGAR, PITBARI, P/O BALADMARI, P/S AND DIST. GOALPARA, ASSAM, PIN-783121 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GHY, ASSAM, PIN 781006 2:THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER KAMRUP METRO BETKUCHI GHY ASSAM PIN 781035 3:THE ASSAM STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION (ASTC) REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR PALTAN BAZAR GHY ASSAM PIN 781008 4:THE TATA CAPITAL LIMITED (FORMERLY TATA MOTORS FINANCE LIMITED) REPRESENTED BY THE BRANCH MANAGER ULUBARI GHY DIST KAMRUP M ASSAM PIN 781007
Page No.# 2/3 5:THE TATA CAPITAL LIMITED (FORMERLY TATA MOTORS FINANCE LIMITED) REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR REGISTERED OFFICE AT 11TH FLOOR TOWER A PENINSULA BUSINESS PARK GANPATRAO KADAM MARG LOWER PAREL MUMBAI 400013 MAHARASHTRA 6:JAKIR HUSSAIN (PROPRIETOR OF J H SECOND HAND MOTORS DEALER) SO ALI AKBOR RO AZAD NAGAR PO BALADMARI PS AND DIST GOALPARA ASSAM PIN 78312 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M H TALUKDAR, MR. A R SIKDAR,MR. S I TALUKDAR Advocate for the Respondent : SC, TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, ASSAM, MD. S ALOM(R6),MS.
R DAS(R4,5),A BIYANI(R4,5),MR. R K BHATRA(R4,5)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 30.07.2026 Heard Shri JA Sikdar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. MD Borah, learned Standing Counsel, Transport Department and Dr. A. Chamuah, learned Standing Counsel, ASTC. The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to an action of blacklisting. Ms. Borah, learned Standing Counsel has however submitted that there are written instructions dated 25.05.2026, as per which, the blacklisting has been removed. She has placed the written instructions dated 25.05.2026 on record.
Page No.# 3/3 Shri Sikdar, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in view of such subsequent action, there may not be any live cause of action which requires adjudication. In view of the aforesaid development, the instant writ petition is closed as infructuous. The written instructions dated 25.05.2026 along with its enclosures are made part of the records. JUDGE Comparing Assistant