Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11405 (BOM)

SANJAY BABANRAO PANDE AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/1059/2022 · 2026-09-22

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 917 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1059 OF 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 917 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1059 OF 2022 SANJAY BABANRAO PANDE AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Adv. A. S. More h/f Adv. V. A. Bagal, Advocate for the Petitioner Adv. N. B. Patil, APP for Respondents-State ... CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATED : 22/09/2026 Per Court: . Though the learned counsel holding for Mr. Bagal seeks time to take instructions, but after going through the record, it appears that the petition is being entertained only in respect of prayer clause-B, under which the notices dated 14.07.2022 and 20.07.2022 are challenged, which were issued for calling explanations. 2. However, it appears that with the passage of time, nothing survives in this petition and accordingly, it stands disposed of. ( VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J. ) ( SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. ) shivani/ 2026:BHC-AUG:43485-DB