Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11403 (KAR)

MALLIKARJUNA K B v. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUITION OFFICER

WP/35535/2025 · 2026-02-24

R Devdas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11487 WP No. 35535 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 35535 OF 2025 (KLR-LG) BETWEEN: MALLIKARJUNA K.B., S/O LATE SRI.BASAVAIAH AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.602, 10TH CROSS, K.R.PURAM, HASSAN TOWN, HASSAN DISTRICT 573 201. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. AKSHATA SHARMA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER HEMAVATHI RESERVOIR PROJECT DC OFFICE BUILDING, HASANA 573 201. 2. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CEN CRIME POLICE, DCRB DIVISION, HASANA 573 201. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HASANA DISTRICT, HASANA 573 201. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11487 WP No. 35535 of 2025 4. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER SAKALESHPUR SUB-DIVISION SAKALESHPUR HASANA DISTRICT 573 134. 5. THE TAHSILDHAR BELUR TALUK, BELUR, HASANA DISTRICT 573 115. 6. THE ASST. DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS HASANA DISTRICT, HASANA 573 201. 7. THE DEPUTY CONSERVATOR OF FOREST HASANA DIVISION HASANA 573 201. 8. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE M.S.BUILDING BENGALURU 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.NAVYA SHEKAR, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER NO.LND/HE.JA,YO(DA):99/2017-18 DATED 25.08.2022 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11487 WP No. 35535 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER The petitioner is aggrieved of the impugned order dated 25.08.2022 passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Hemavathi Reservoir Project, Hassan, in case No.L.N.D/He.Ja.Yo(Da):99/2017-18. 2. The petitioner claim to be the legal representatives of Sri.Basavaiah, who lost the lands due to submergence of lands under water on the construction of Hemavati/Yagachi/Vatehole Reservoir Project. In terms of the scheme proposed by the State Government, a person who lost land on account of submergence for the project, would not only be entitled for compensation but also entitled for grant of alternative lands to ensure that the livelihood of such agriculturists are not lost. Accordingly, 4 acres of land in Block No.1 of Sy.No.11 of Makkihalli Village, Hanubalu Hobli, Sakleshpura Taluk, Hassan District were granted. However, - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11487 WP No. 35535 of 2025 several irregularities were found in the matter of allotment of alternative lands. Action was directed by the State Government having regard to such irregularities. The Special Land Acquisition Officer (for short ‘SLAO’) has passed the impugned order in respect of the petitioners cancelling the grant. 3. Having regard to the ground on which the impugned order has been passed, it is clear that the SLAO has cancelled the grant on one of the following grounds : a) Grant was made to a person who had not lost any land in submergence; b) Bogus grant order has been created, although no such grant order was passed; c) Dual grant orders have been passed on thebasis of one award passed by the SLAO; d) Such dual grant orders and fictitious grant orders have been passed during the tenure of Sri V.Srinivas Gowda or Sri B.A.Jagadeesh who were the then Special Land Acquisition Officers; e) Land granted is a forest land and not revenue lands and therefore it could not have been granted. - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11487 WP No. 35535 of 2025 4. The factual information and the ground on which the impugned order of cancellation has been passed by the SLAO is identifiable as one of the grounds noticed hereinabove. Therefore, all other observations made in the impugned order are hereby set aside as not specifically applicable to the petitioners. It is also a fact that the impugned order of cancellation was passed without hearing the grantee and therefore, on the ground of denial of principles of natural justice alone, the impugned order of cancellation is required to be set aside. 5. Consequently, this Court proceeds to pass the following: ORDER i) Writ petition is allowed in part. ii) The impugned order dated 25.08.2022 in case No.L.N.D/He.Ja.Yo(Da):99/2017-18 passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Hemavathi Reservoir Project, Hassan, at Annexure ‘A’, is hereby quashed and set aside. iii) The matter stands remanded back to the SLAO to reconsider the matter afresh after affording an - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11487 WP No. 35535 of 2025 opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner is permitted to submit any material to defend the order of grant. iv) Insofar as the cancellation orders passed on the ground that the land in question is a forest land and not revenue land and therefore, it could not have been granted, the SLAO is required to reconsider the matter after securing the opinion from the forest department as well as the Revenue department. If ultimately it is found that the land is a forest land, then alternative lands shall be granted to the petitioners. v) Consequent to the restoration of the grant in favour of the petitioner, the revenue entries shall also be restored in the RTC. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE GPG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42