IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 954 of 2026 ----- Ankit Kumar, S/o Sunil Kumar Gupta .... Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party(s). ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Ms. Rupa Kumari, Advocate Mr. Rahul Raja, Advocate For the State : Ms. Nehala Sharmin, Spl. P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Manoj Kr. Ram, Advocate Mr. Prakash Kumar, Advocate …...... 03/ 16.03.2026: It has been submitted that there is typographical error in the order dated 27.02.2026 passed in this case, wherein at paragraph No.1 some Sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita have wrongly been typed. 2. In this case, the only Sections punishable are Sections 66(B), 66(C) & 66(D) of the IT Act as well as Sections 318(2)/ 318(3)/ 318(4)/ 319(2)/336(2)/ 336(3)/ 338/ 340(2) & 61(2) of BNS. 3. Thus, in the order dated 27.02.2026 at paragraph No.1, the Sections punishable in this case should be read as “Sections 66(B), 66(C) & 66(D) of the IT Act as well as Sections 318(2)/ 318(3)/ 318(4)/319(2)/336(2)/ 336(3)/ 338/ 340(2) & 61(2) of BNS.” 4. Further, in the 5th paragraph at 3rd line of the order, the amount has wrongly been typed as Rs.45,0000/-, which should have been Rs.45,000/-. Thus, in the 5th paragraph at 3rd line of the order, the amount should be read as “Rs.45,000/-“. 5. The order dated 27.02.2026 is accordingly modified to the aforesaid extent only. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 16th March, 2026 R.S./