Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1140 (GAU)

HARI PRASAD BARUAH v. NITYANANDA DAS AND ANR

I.A.(Crl.)/243/2026 · 2026-03-09

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010042402026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Linked Case : I.A.(Crl.)/243/2026 HARI PRASAD BARUAH S/O LATE DHARMESWAR BARUAH R/O CHARING SONARIBARI P.O. CHARING P.S. GAURISAGAR DIST. SIVASAGAR ASSAM VERSUS NITYANANDA DAS AND ANR SON OF LATE RUDRAKANTA DAS R/O NAMDANG SILASAKU (PATHALIAL) P.O. GAURISAGAR P.S. SIVASAGAR DIST. SIVASAGAR ASSAM 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. S ROY Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for NITYANANDA DAS AND ANR Page No.# 2/3 B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 10.03.2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. This application is filed for allowing the petitioner to remain on previous bail in connection with N.I. Case No. 06/2022, wherein the petitioner was convicted and sentenced to undergo Simple Imprisonment for 2 (two) months and to pay a fine of Rs. 3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakhs) only, which was upheld by the learned Sessions Judge, Sivasagar, in Crl. A. No. 32(3) of 2025. It is submitted that the petitioner is 77 years old. Considering the facts of the case, he may be allowed to remain on previous bail. Having regard to the above averments made, the prayer to allow the petitioner/accused to remain on previous bail is allowed. The petitioner shall remain on previous bail until further orders are passed in the connected Criminal Appeal. The I.A. stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Page No.# 3/3 Comparing Assistant