906 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 198 OF 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 906 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 198 OF 2010 IN WP/4132/2009 Ghanshyam S/o. Santoba Ubale Versus Vyankati Baliram Nilawad And Another __________________________________________________________ • Adv. S. R. Bagal for the Petitioner • Adv. Shahaji C. Nadare h/f. Adv. R. V. Naiknaware for Respondent No. 2 __________________________________________________________ CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 23, 2026 ORDER : [PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.] 1) In the order under contempt, remaining retiral benefits were directed to be paid to the petitioner within eight weeks with simple interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date on which the amount became due and payable to the petitioner. 2) Notices were issued in the contempt petition in the year 2010. Thereafter, the matter was not circulated after 19.11.2010. 3) Learned advocate for the respondent - Municipal Council makes a statement that the amount as directed under the order under contempt is paid to the petitioner. Komal Kamble Page| 1 of 2 2026:BHC-AUG:43495 906 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 198 OF 2010 4) In view of the statement made by the respondent and otherwise also, as the contempt petition is not circulated after 2011, the contempt petition stands disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) JUDGE (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE Komal Kamble Page| 2 of 2