SRI. ANNAPPA H TALWAR @TIMMANNANAVAR. v. M/S KARNATAKA BANK LTD.,
WP/29080/2024 · 2026-03-18
Lalitha Kanneganti
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11396 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11396 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16073 WP No. 29080 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 29080 OF 2024 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI. ANNAPPA H. TALWAR @TIMMANNANAVAR.
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS.
S/O HANUMANTHAPPA TIMMANNANVAR,
2.
SRI. MAHILINGAPPA H. TALAWAR, @TIMMANNANAVAR, S/O HANUMANTHAPPA TIMMANNANVAR,
3.
SMT. SHANTHAVVA HITTALAMANI MAJOR D/O HANUMANTHAPPA TIMMANNANVAR,
4.
SMT. PARAMMA HULAGURA, MAJOR D/O HANUMANTHAPPA TIMMANNANVAR,
5.
SMT. RENAVVA MAJOR, D/O HANUMANTHAPPA TIMMANNANVAR,
PETITIONER NO.1 TO 5 RESIDING AT SANKALIPURA - 581 107 KALAS, KUNDGOL TALUK, DHARWAD DISTRICT.
Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16073 WP No. 29080 of 2024
6.
SRI. KALLAPPA R. MUNDINAMANI.
AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS.
S/O RAMAPPA MUNDINAMANI HOUSE NO. 25, CHIKKANARSHI 581 107 KUNDGOL TALUK, DHARWAD DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KESHAV M. DATAR, ADVOCATE) AND:
M/S KARNATAKA BANK LTD., HAVING ITS REGISTERED AND HEAD OFFICE AT MANGALURU - 575 002 AND AMONGST OTHER BRANCHES ONE CALLED KUNDGOL BRANCH, KUNDGOL, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. NITHIN CHANDRA M, ADVOCATE)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DTD. 30.09.2024 PASSED IN O.A.NO. 1367/2023 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE BEFORE THE HONBLE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL-I BENGALURU VIDE ANNX-A AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16073 WP No. 29080 of 2024
ORAL ORDER
A memo has been filed by the learned counsel for the petitioners stating that the petitioners have paid the entire loan amount by way of One Time Settlement. Hence, nothing survives for consideration.
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
4. Pending IAs., if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
SMC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 25