2026:JHHC:619 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 5704 of 2024 Harshit Sahu, aged about 44 years, son of Dhiraj Prasad Sahu, resident of Baldeo Bhawan, Thana Road, Lohardaga, P.O. Lohardaga, P.S. Lohardaga, District Lohardaga, Jharkhand. ….........Petitioner(s) Vrs. 1. The State of Jharkhand through Secretary, Department of Revenue, Registration and Land Reforms, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, P.O. Dhurwa, P.S. Dhurwa, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Latehar, having its office at Latehar, P.O. Latehar, P.S. Latehar, District Latehar, Jharkhand. 3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Latehar, having its office at Latehar, P.O. Latehar, P.S. Latehar, District Latehar, Jharkhand. 4. Senior Superintendent of Police, Latehar having its office at Latehar, P.O. Latehar, P.S. Latehar, District Latehar, Jharkhand. 5. The District Collector, Latehar having its office at Latehar Collectorate, P.O. Chandwa, P.S. Chandwa, District Latehar, Jharkhand 6. The Circle Officer, Chandwa, having its office at Chandwa, P.O. Chandwa, P.S. Chandwa, District Latehar, Jharkhand. 7. Officer-in-Charge, Chandwa Police, Station, P.O. Chandwa, P.S. Chandwa, District Latehar, Jharkhand 8. Sheikh Rahmat Ali, Son of Jamiwat Ali, resident of Chandwa, P.O. Chandwa, P.S. Chandwa, District Latehar, Jharkhand. 9. Mahendra Prasad, son of Mahavir Saw, resident of Dharampur, P.O. Latehar, P.S. Latehar, District Latehar, Jharkhand. .......... Respondent(s) ….... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate Mr. Arpan Mishra, Advocate For the Resp.-State : Mr. Srikant Swaroop, AC to AAG-II For the Resp. No. 9 : Mr. Sidhartha Roy, Advocate 11/12.01.2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file fresh one with better particulars. 2. With the aforesaid liberty, the present writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. 3. In view of the order of withdrawal and since, no effective order has been passed, there is no need for either substitution of the respondent no. 8 or service of notice upon the legal heir. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) 12.01.2026 A. Mohanty Uploaded ____/____/2026