SOHEB AKHTAR ALIAS DHULU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./829/2026 · 2026-02-26
Deepak Roshan
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11392 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11392 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:5743 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 829 of 2026
--------- Soheb Akhtar @ Dhulu, aged about 22 years, s/o. Jiyaul Pagla @ Jiyaul Shekh, r/o. village Jankinagar, P.O. Pakur, P.S. Pakur (Muffasil), Dist. Pakur, Jharkhand.
....Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
....Opp. Party
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
--------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Kr. Dubey, Advocate
Mr. Yuvraj Singh, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, A.P.P.
--------- 02/ 26.02.2026 Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 109(1)/61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 27 & 35 of the Arms Act, 1959.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence at all and has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and he has been implicated in this case only because he happens to be the son of co-accused Jiyaul Shekh, who has already been enlarged on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 08.12.2025 in B.A. No. 11311 of 2025. He further submits that petitioner is languishing in custody since 14.11.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition imposed by this court.
4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
5. Having regard to the facts that the petitioner’s name appeared on the confessional statement of co-accused Jiyaul Shekh, who has been granted regular bail by this Court; I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released
2026:JHHC:5743 2 on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pakur in connection with Pakur (Town) P.S. Case No. 275/2025.
6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and if any adverse report will come against the petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner.
(Deepak Roshan, J.) 26th February, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded on 27.02.2026