HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 36004 of 2026 Court No. - 79 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State. 2. The present application has been preferred for seeking quashing of charge-sheet dated 08.03.2026 along with cognizance/summoning order dated 01.07.2026 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Sahaswan, Budaun as well as entire proceedings of Case No.1285 of 2026 (State vs. Rashid @ Hafiz and Others) arising out of Case Crime No.07 of 2026, under Sections 221, 352, 351(2) BNS, P.S. Mujariya, District- Budaun. 3. Firstly, learned counsel for applicants submits before this Court that offences under Sections 221, 352, 351(2) BNS are non-cognizable and in view of the explanation to Section 2(1)h BNSS, the charge sheet filed by the Investigating Officer concerned cannot proceed as a police case and the same is liable to be proceeded with as a complaint case. In support of his submission, learned counsel of applicants has placed reliance upon the judgments passed in the case of Shakila Bano and others Vs. State of U.P. and another, 2008 (61) ACC 636. 4. Secondly, learned counsel for applicants submits that cognizance of offence taken up against the applicants in pursuance to section 221 BNS is barred with the provisions contained under section 215 BNSS, since the prosecution of applicants for the offence under Section 221 BNS, is permissible only on a complaint in writing made by the competent officer, whose order could have been violated by the accused; the prosecution for offence under Section 221 BNS cannot be initiated on a police report. In Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Padmaker Pandey, Rakesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rashid @ Hafiz And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) support of his second submission, learned counsel for applicants relied upon the judgement rendered by Hon'ble Gujarat High Court in Rabari Nagabhai Jetabhai Vanda vs. State of Gujarat, decided on 13.02.2026 in Crl. Misc. Application (for quashing and set aside FIR/Order) No.21473 of 2025. 4. Although, learned AGA opposed the prayer sought through the instant application, but did not dispute the submissions so made by learned counsel for applicants. 5. Before proceeding further, the relevant provisions of Section 2(1)h BNSS are being reproduced for ready reference as under:- "2. Definitions.- (1) In this Sanhita, unless the context otherwise requires,- (h) "complaint" means any allegation made orally or in writing to a Magistrate, with a view to his taking action under this Sanhita, that some person, whether known or unknown, has committed an offence, but does not include a police report. Explanation.- A report made by a police officer in a case which discloses, after investigation, the commission of a non- cognizable offence shall be deemed to be a complaint; and the police officer by whom such report is made shall be deemed to be the complainant." 6. In view of the above explanation, charge sheet submitted by the concerned Investigating Officer in the present case under Sections 221, 352, 351(2) BNS shall be treated as complaint and it is to be decided as complaint and the learned Magistrate fell in legal error by taking cognizance as State case and the orders passed by him is, therefore, liable to be set aside. 7. Since the legal issue has been raised by learned counsel for the applicants and as such process to issue notice to opposite party no.2 is hereby dispensed with. 8. In view thereof, cognizance/summoning order dated 01.07.2026 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Sahaswan, Budaun against the applicants on the basis of charge-sheet submitted by concerned Investigating Officer under Sections 221, 352, 351(2) BNS treating the same as State case, is set aside, in respect of applicant(s) herein. 9. Accordingly, the instant application is partly allowed. NA528 No. 36004 of 2026 2 10. However, it is made clear that this order shall not preclude the learned court concerned to proceed with the case treating it as complaint case, if required, in accordance with law. September 29, 2026 Saif NA528 No. 36004 of 2026 3 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAIKH SAIF ABDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad