Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11380 (ALL)

JAYJEET MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 ORS.

WRIA/33721/2016 · 2026-09-28

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 33721 of 2016 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Khare, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Ms. Anuradha Sundaram, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, and learned counsel for the respondent-BSA. The writ petition has been filed with a prayer to quash the orders dated 27.02.2016/01.03.2016 passed by the District Basic Education Officer, Shahjahanpur, and with a further prayer to direct the respondents to forthwith accord consideration to the petitioner for appointment as an Assistant Teacher in a Junior Basic School of District Shahjahanpur, treating the BTC training certificate possessed by the petitioner to be a valid qualification. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel submits that, after the coming into force of the notification dated 23.08.2010, the NCTE has made TET to be mandatory qualification for appointment to the post of Assistant Teacher. Accordingly, the relief as prayed for cannot be granted. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed. September 29, 2026 Rahul. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Khare, Sanjeev Kumar Khare, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : Girijesh Kumar Tripathi, Vaibhava Tripathi, Bharat Pratap Singh, C.S.C., Santosh Kumar, Vaibhav Tripathi (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Jayjeet Maurya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAHUL GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad