Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11378 (DEL)

SUNITA JOSHI v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 60(1), DELHI & ORS.

W.P.(C)/7337/2026 · 2026-07-07

Dinesh Mehta, Rajneesh Kumar Gupta

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7337/2026, CM APPL. 35776/2026, CM APPL. 35777/2026 SUNITA JOSHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amar Kumar and Mr. Chintu Kumar, Advocates. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 60(1), DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shlok Chandra, SSC, Ms. Nancy Jain, Ms. Madhavi Shukla, JSCs and Mr. Udit Dutt, Advocate. Mr. Siddhartha Sinha, SSC for respondent no. 6. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA O R D E R % 07.07.2026 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to avail statutory remedy under the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. In case, the petitioner prefers an appeal within a period of thirty (30) days from today, the Appellate Authority shall decide the appeal on merits without raising any objection about the limitation inasmuch as the petitioner has been bonafidely pursuing the present petition during the intervening period. 3. The writ petition stands disposed of along with pending applications. DINESH MEHTA, J. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J. JULY 7, 2026/v This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/07/2026 at 11:05:35