APHC010787582016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 43537/2016 Between: 1. KONDAVEETI SRINIVASA RAO,, S/O. RAJA RAO, AGED 38 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, RIO. FLAT NO.401, SVR MANSONETTS, 1-2, CHANDRAMOUII NAGAR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. KONDAVEETI SIVAKUMARI,, W/O. SRINIVAS RAO, AGED 39 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS RIO. FLAT NO.401, SVR MANSONETTS, 1- 2, CHANDRAMOULI NAGAR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. KONDAVEETI MAGHUVAMANCHALI,, W/O. CHINA RAJA RAO, AGED 55 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS RIO. FLAT NO.401, SVR MANSONETTS, 1-2, CHANDRAMOULI NAGAR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL, SECRETARY - DEPT. OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVLEOPMENT, M2, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE ANDHRA PRADESH CAPITAL REGION DEVELOPMENT, AUTHORITY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, LENIN CENTRE, GOVERNORPET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 VS,J W.P.No.43537 of 2016 pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in passing Order Re.No.405/2016/APCRDA/DT(PS), dated 15.10.2016, as illegal, arbitrary, non-application of mind and contrary to the AP Capital City Land Pooling Scheme (formulation & implementation) Rules, 2015, and set aside the same and further direct the 2nd respondent to consider allotment of 1200 Sq.yards commercial plot in lieu of 1 acre non-agriculture land contributed by the petitioners and pass such other order or orders as may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 53726 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim direction directing the Respondents not to allot 19.67 x 1200 Sq.yards _ 23604 Sq.yards commercial area to third parties in the layouts prepared in relation to the said two villages Tulluru & Kondamaraju Palem, pending disposal of the above write petition a pass such other or further orders as deem Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V SESHA KUMARI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) 2. S PRANATHI 3. ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following: 3 VS,J W.P.No.43537 of 2016 ORDER: When the writ petition came up for hearing on 08.09.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, as such, the matter was posted to 15.09.2026. Even on 15.09.2026, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of counsel for the petitioners, hence, the matter was directed to be posted on 22.09.2026 under the caption ‘to be dismissed for default’. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘to be dismissed for default’, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It seems that the petitioners are not evincing any interest in pursuing the matter. In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Petition shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 22.09.2026 Gss