NARAYAN BAPURAO SURANG AND ORS v. THE STATE OF MAH AND ORS
CP/376/2010 · 2026-09-23
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11364 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11364 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
912 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 376 OF 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 912 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 376 OF 2010 IN WP/1120/2010 Narayan S/o. Bapurao Surang And Others Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Others __________________________________________________________ • Ms. U. S. Bhosale, A.G.P. for State __________________________________________________________
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 23, 2026
ORDER : [PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.] 1) None for the petitioners. 2) In the order under contempt, respondent no. 4 - Executive Engineer was directed to decide the representation of the petitioners. Accordingly, respondent no. 4 has filed affidavit-in-reply and stated that the application of the petitioners is decided and rejected by
order dated 02.08.2010. 3) In view of the compliance of the order by deciding the representation, nothing survives in the present contempt petition and the same stands disposed of.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) JUDGE (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE Komal Kamble
Page| 1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:43501