Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:38296] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7266/2026 CNR: RJHC010812612026 | URN: CRLMP / 12569U / 2026 Hamid Mohammad S/o Shri Ahmed Mohammad, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Antroli Sanga, P.o. Degana,district Nagaur (Raj). ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
2. AU Small Finance Bank, Through Its Branch Manager,parbatsar- Kishangarh Road, First Floor, Ramapeer Complex, Near Rathi Petrol Pump, Kishangarh Road, Parbatsar District Deedwana Kuchaman (Raj).
3. The Deputy Inspector General Of Police, Cyber Crime, Rajasthan Police Headquarters,jaipur Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Lalit Kumawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. P.K. Bhati, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order 10/08/2026
1. The instant criminal misc. petition under Section 528 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:-
“It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the present misc. petition while directing the respondents to remove the debit freeze imposed on the Bank Account bearing No. 1711222712065418 of the petitioner, and permit the petitioner to operate the said account.......”
2. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this misc. petition with a direction to the AU Small Finance Bank (respondent No.2) to keep the disputed amount (the amount which was transferred illegally in the bank account of the petitioner) frozen
[2026:RJ-JP:38296] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7266/2026] and allow the petitioner to make transactions from his bank account from the remaining balance.
3. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent – Bank has not received the information regarding the exact figure of the disputed amount, which the Investigating Officer/Police alleges to be receipt(s) of the offence, the bank shall send a communication to the concerned Investigating Officer/Police, to indicate the amount to be earmarked for lien, while endorsing a copy of the instant order.
4. Upon receipt of such communication/letter, the concerned Investigating Officer/Police shall be under an obligation to apprise the respondent - Bank about the amount to be kept in lien, within a period of seven days of receiving the communication from the respondent - Bank. The respondent – bank shall thereafter do the needful as directed herein above.
5. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent-Bank does not receive any reply from the concerned Investigating Officer/Police, then it shall be duty bound to act in accordance with the instant order.
6. Stay petition as well as all pending application, if any, stand
disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 237/Dinesh Suthar