$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8627/2026 AIRA REHMAN THROUGH HER NATURAL GUARDIAN (MOTHER) NAZIA ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitesh Saini, Mr. Haider Ali, Ms. Inza Shahzad, Advs. versus QUEEN MARYS SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr Dhruv Rohatgi Panel Counsel GNCTD Ms Chandrika Sachdeva Mr Dhruv Kumar, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 03.07.2026 1. This is a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers :- “a. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, including a writ in the nature of Mandamus and/or Certiorari, declaring the action of Respondent No.1 in declaring the Petitioner as “Fail” in the Annual Examination of Class XI for the Academic Session 2025-26 as arbitrary, illegal, discriminatory, unreasonable and contrary to the applicable Promotion Policy and Assessment Guidelines issued by the Directorate of Education, Government of NCT of Delhi, and consequently set aside the impugned result to the said extent; b. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing Respondent No.1 School to permit the Petitioner to appear in This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/07/2026 at 11:03:51 a compartment examination, reexamination, improvement examination or any other remedial academic assessment contemplated under the applicable guidelines in the subject of Economics, thereby affording the Petitioner one further opportunity to remove the deficiency and continue her academic studies without loss of the academic year; c. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Respondents to declare the result of the Petitioner afresh upon successful completion of the compartment/re-examination and to grant all consequential academic benefits flowing therefrom. ...” 2. After some arguments it is agreed that the present writ petition will be considered as a representation of the petitioner and the Department of Education will pass a speaking order within 2 weeks from today. 3. Needless to state, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the said Order, the petitioner will be at liberty to challenge the said speaking order in accordance with law. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms. JASMEET SINGH, J JULY 3, 2026/AS This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/07/2026 at 11:03:51