CRL OP No. 5660 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 05-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M. NIRMAL KUMAR CRL OP No. 5660 of 2026 Vairam @ Vairamuthu S/o.Deivasigamani, No.2/27, Gandhi Street, Kalattipettai Village, Kundrathur, Chennai - 600 069. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The State Rep. by the Commissioner of Police, Office of Commissionerate, Tambaram, Chennai - 600 045. 2. The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Thirumudivakkam Police Station, Chennai. ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: The criminal original petitioner filed under Section 528 of BNSS, to direct the second respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 27.02.2026 not to harass the petitioner and his family members without due process of law to secure ends of justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.Ramesh For Respondent(s): Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Additional Public Prosecutor ORDER The criminal original petition has been filed to direct the second respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 27.02.2026 and not to harass the petitioner and his family members. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 5660 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner gave a representation dated 25.02.2026, which was forwarded to the second respondent. But no action has been taken by the respondent police in this regard. Further, on instructions, he submitted that the petitioner will be ready to appear before the respondent police on any given date. 3.Considering the submissions made and on perusal of the materials available on record, it is seen that the petitioner sent a representation to the Commissioner of Police on 25.02.2026, which was forwarded to the second respondent. The second respondent gave C.No.441/DC-TBM/Civil/ 2025. The commissioner of Police, Tambaram City, gathered information as follows: “5.It is further learnt that, to retaliate the murder of Albert, his father Dominic (52 AD) S/o. Arulappa, approached notorious rowdy Vairam @ Vairamuthu (47, SC, Kunrathur PS HS) S/o.Deivasigamani, (Total cases 32; 103 BNS 04; 109 BNS 06; others 22) and paid some amount to eliminate Suresh and his accomplice. Vairamuthu accepted the deal and planning to climinate Suresh and his accomplices and vice-versa.” for that purpose, the petitioner what was kept under watch. However, the petitioner was never called for any enquiry. Now, the petitioner undertakes to appear before the second respondent police on 12.03.2026 and give his https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 5660 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 explanation, if required. The petitioner is also ready to give an undertaking that he will not indulge in any criminal activities affecting the public tranquillity and peace. If the petitioner fails to appear before the second respondent police on 12.03.2026, appropriate action may be initiated against the petitioner. With the above direction, the criminal original petition is disposed of. 05-03-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No sms To 1. The State Rep. by the Commissioner of Police, Office of Commissionerate, Tambaram, Chennai - 600 045. 2. The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Thirumudivakkam Police Station, Chennai. 3. The Public Prosecutor High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 5660 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J. sms CRL OP No. 5660 of 2026 05-03-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis