Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11352 (PAT)

ChanKishore Kumar @ Chandrashekhar Kumar @ Kaila v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./4321/2026 · 2026-03-31

Sandeep Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4321 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2025 Thana- SALAKHUA District- Saharsa ====================================================== ChanKishore Kumar @ Chandrashekhar Kumar @ Kaila Son of Ramchandra Yadav R/V - Ghoghsam, Ward no. 1, P.S. - Simri Bakhtiyarpur, Dist. - Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Sanjo Devi W/o Madan Yadav Resident of Village khojraha Ward No 16 P.S. Salakhua District Saharsa ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 31-03-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Salakhua P.S. Case No. 41/2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 96, 3(5) of B.N.S. and Section 12 of POCSO Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner is alleged of kidnapping the victim. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that from the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4321 of 2026(3) dt.31-03-2026 2/2 statement of the victim, it appears that she has eloped with the petitioner and has got married to him. Petitioner has clean antecedent and he is in custody since 13.09.2025. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the case/ trial. 5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this application for regular bail is allowed. 7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge, POCSO, Saharsa /concerned Court below in connection with Salkhua P.S. Case No. 41/2025. tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T