Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11351 (PAT)

Md. Rahishuddin v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./20128/2026 · 2026-04-01

Sandeep Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20128 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2026 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Nawada ====================================================== Md. Rahishuddin Son of Late Jamal Uddin Resident of Aligarh,P.S. -Kotwali, Dist. - Aligarh (Uttar Pradesh), Presently residing at House of Md. Isrial Mallick, Ansar Nagar, P.S. - Bundelkhand, Dist. - Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr .Deepak Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 01-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection Cyber P.S. Case No. 12/2026 dated 27.01.2026 for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 318(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 336(3), 338, 340(2), 317(2), 317(5), 61(2) of the B.N.S. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner in the name of providing clothes the petitioner accepted the money and did not supply the clothes. When the accused persons were arrested it was disclosed that the accused persons including the petitioner were involved in cyber crime. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20128 of 2026(2) dt.01-04-2026 2/2 case. It is further submitted that the petitioner sells clothes on cheaper rates but he has not committed any cyber fraud from any person. He is in custody since 28.01.2026 and has no criminal antecedent. 5. Considering the aforesaid facts that the petitioner has cheated large number of persons, this application is dismissed. 6. If the trial is delayed by the prosecution, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail. atul/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T