Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11351 (AP)

D. Subramanyam v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/9734/2026 · 2026-09-22

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010187742026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9734 OF 2026 Between: 1. D. Subramanyam, S/o. Krishna Reddy, Aged about 38 Years, R/o. D.NO.20-2-508/B, Maruthi Nagar, Koiigunta, Tirupati, Chittoor District. ...Petitioner AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep, by its.. Principal Secretary Energy Department, Secretariat Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District 522238 2. The Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Distribution Company APSPDCL, Rep by its Chairman and Managing Director (CMD) at Corporate office 19-13- 65/A, Kesavayanagunta Srinivasapuram, Tiruchanoor Road, TIRUPATI 517503. 3. The Superintendent Engineer, Operation Town, APSPDCL Tirupati District 517501 4. The Deputy Executive Engineer, Operation Sub Division-Ill, APSPDCL Tirupati District 517501 5. The Executive Engineer, Operation (Town), APSPDCL Tirupati District 517501 ...Respondents 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue an order or orders or direction or a writ one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not restoring/providing electricity service connection to the petitioners premises situated in Sy.No. 195/3, Damineedu Village, Tiruchanur Mandal, Tirupati District, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitution al, and violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India Consequently direct the respondents to forthwith restore the electricity service connection to the petitioners premises in compliance with the order dated 26.02.2026 passed in C.G.No.478/2025-26 by the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum, Tirupati, and Pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: SOMISETTY GANESH BABU Counsel for the Respondents: VENKATA RAMA RAO KOTA SC FOR APSPDCL Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR ENERGY 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 9734 OF 2026 The Court made the following order: Sri B.V. Pavan Kumar, learned counsel representing the Writ Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition. 2. Permission granted. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. 4. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J Dt: 23.09.2026 Mnr 4 168 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION No.9734 OF 2026 Dt: 23.09.2026 Mnr