Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1135 (JHR)

RAHUL KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE SECRETARY PR SECRETARY PERSONNEL ADMIN REFORMS AND RAJBHASHA

WPC/2543/2020 · 2026-01-05

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:102 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 2543 of 2020 …… Rahul Kumar, aged about 29 years, son of Sri Bishwanath Prasad Verma, resident of Jorasankh, P.O. Dwarpahari, P.S. Jamua, District-Giridih. …. Petitioner(s) -VERSUS- 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary/Principal Secretary, Personnel Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha Department, having its office at Project Building, Dhurwa, P.O & P.S. Dhurwa, Town and District- Ranchi. 2. Jharkhand Public Service Commission, through its Secretary, having its office at Circular Road, Lalpur, P.O. & P.S.-Lalpur, Town and District-Ranchi. 3. The Controller of Examination, Jharkhand Public Service Commission, having its office at Circular Road, Lalpur, P.O. & P.S. Lalpur, Town and District-Ranchi. …..Respondent (s) …… CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manoj Tandon, Adv For the Respondent (s) : Mr. Aman Shekhar, A.C. to G.A.-I For the Resp.-JPSC : Mr. Sanjoy Piprawall, Adv …… 06/05.01.2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant writ application has become infructuous as the petitioner has already been employed somewhere else. 2. Having regard to the aforesaid submission, the instant writ application stands dismissed as infructuous. (Deepak Roshan, J) 05.01.2026 Amardeep/ Uploaded 09/01/2026