$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 622/2026 and CRL.M.(BAIL) 1146/2026 MANOJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Counsel (appearance not given) versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 07.07.2026 1. The applicant made various submissions as to why the bail to the applicant should be granted at this point of time. He has also submitted that out of 38 witnesses, only 3 witnesses have been examined. 2. The Courts in various cases have considered long incarceration to be the sufficient ground to enlarge the applicants on bail. It be noted that the date of rejection of the petitioner’s bail application by the Trial Court is 26.12.2025. The Court was of the view that the applicant should go back to the Trial Court and to apply afresh. 3. At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the application with liberty to approach the Trial Court to apply afresh. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the permission to withdraw is granted. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/07/2026 at 10:32:24 Accordingly, the application stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 5. All rights and contentions are left open. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J JULY 7, 2026 aks This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/07/2026 at 10:32:24