Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11348 (RAJ)

BABULAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/3300/2026 · 2026-08-10

Kuldeep Mathur

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:38137] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 3300/2026 CNR: RJHC010398142026 | URN: CRLMP / 5923U / 2026 1. Babulal S/o Ramswaroop, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of 50, Gharo Ka Bas, Sojat Pali. 2. Bhanwar Lal Seervi S/o Andaram, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of Behind Aayurved Hospital, Bhavi, Bilara, District Jodhpur. 3. Paras Ram Seervi S/o Prabhu Ram, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Jaidev Garden, Bilara, Jodhpur Rural, District Jodhpur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor 2. Govind Devra S/o Chain Devra, Resident Of Near Nathdwara School, Bilara, Jodhpur Rural, District Jodhpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kapil Purohit assisted by Mr. Dhruv Chandora Ms. Aditi Vyas For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pawan Kr. Bhati, PP Mr. Madan Lal, ASI, P.S. Udaimandir, Jodhpur. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR Order 10/08/2026 Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he does not want to press the instant criminal misc. petition with a liberty to the petitioners to file a representation before the competent authority. In view of the above submission, the misc. petition as well as stay application are dismissed as not pressed. However, the [2026:RJ-JP:38137] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-3300/2026] petitioners are permitted to submit a representation alongwith the relevant documents before the Investigating Officer and the Investigating Officer is directed to consider the documents in an objective manner before forming any opinion. (KULDEEP MATHUR),J 287/Himanshu Singh