911 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 330 OF 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 911 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 330 OF 2010 Salauddin Alimoddin S/o. Alimoddin And 4 Others Versus The State Of Maharashtra And 3 Others __________________________________________________________ • Adv. Jaybhay Bibhishan R. for the Petitioners - Absent • Mr. N. B. Patil, A.G.P. for State __________________________________________________________ CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 23, 2026 ORDER : [PER VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, J.] 1) None for the petitioners. 2) In the order under contempt, it was directed to initiate the acquisition proceedings and declare the award and pay compensation to the petitioners within one year from the date of the order. 3) Respondent No. 4 – State has filed affidavit-in- reply, wherein it is stated that subsequently the directions were complied by passing the award and the Government had also sanctioned the compensation amount and same was given to the Municipal Council, Beed. Komal Kamble Page| 1 of 2 2026:BHC-AUG:43500 911 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 330 OF 2010 4) The contempt petition has not been circulated since 2011. It is presumed that the amount which was sanctioned by the Government must have been disbursed to the petitioners. 5) In view of the same, nothing survives in the present contempt petition and the same stands disposed of. (VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) JUDGE (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE Komal Kamble Page| 2 of 2