Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11341 (ALL)

TAUSEEF RAZA @ ADIL v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NABAIL/10158/2026 · 2026-09-28

Vivek Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 10158 of 2026 Court No. - 72 HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that there are some glaring defects in the application, which cannot be rectified by way of amendment application. Therefore, present application be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to the applicant to file fresh application. 2. Accordingly, present application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty aforesaid. 3. Office is directed to return certified copies to learned counsel for the applicant after obtaining photocopies of the same as per rules. September 29, 2026 Lalit Shukla Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Upendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) Tauseef Raza @ Adil .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- LALIT KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad