Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11334 (CHH)

SANT KUMAR PATEL v. THE REGISTRAR FIRMS AND SOCIETY

WPC/1983/2026 · 2026-04-26

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:19257 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1983 of 2026 Sant Kumar Patel Son Of Shri Vishnucharan Patel Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Bhanwarpur, Tahsil Basna, District Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - The Registrar Firms And Society State Of Chhattisgarh, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Deputy Registrar Firms And Societies, State Of Chhattisgarh, In- drawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The President (Smt. Usha Patel) Akhil Bhartiya Aghariya Samaj, Kendriya Samiti Raigarh, Kotra Road, Raigarh (C.G.) 4 - Vishnucharan Patel Zonal Incharge, Pithora Zonal, Village Arbichpi- men, Tahsil Pithora, District Mahasamund (C.G.) 5 - Tikaram Kashyap Son Of Shri Shiv Narayan Kashyap R/o Singhan- pur, Tahsil Basna, District Mahasamund (C.G.) 6 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Deputy Secretary, Depart- ment Of Commerce And Industries, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate For State : Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 27.04.2026 1 By filing the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs :- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court, may kindly call for the entire record in relates to the case of the Petitioner. YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.04.28 10:23:37 +0530 2 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court, may kindly be pleased to direct the Respondent No. 02 to decide the pending application/petition dated 19.03.2026 (Ann P-1) filed by the Petitioner, within stipulated period, in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, any other relief, this Hon'ble Court, deem fit and proper may adse kindly be granted to the Petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the application under challenge has already been decided by the authorities, as such, he does not wish to pursue the present petition. 3 Learned State counsel does not oppose the aforesaid submission. 4 Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh