- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19665 WP No. 9294 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 9294 OF 2022 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. SRI H.SURESH SON OF HANUMANTHAPPA N.H., AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/AT DOOR NO.226, 12/A, 5TH MAIN BACK ROAD, MYSURU-570 012, AADHAAR CARD NO.4847 5760 5146 2. MT.PREMA KUMARI W/O H.SURESH AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT DOOR NO.226 12/A, 5TH MAIN, BACK ROAD MYSURU-570 012 AADHAR CARD NO.243254616281 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MADHUKESHWAR H.M., ADVOCATE) AND: APTUS VALUE HOUSING FINANCE INDIA LTD., NO.8B, DOSHI TOWERS, 205, POONAMLLEE HIGH ROAD, KILPAUK, CHENNAI -600 010 Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19665 WP No. 9294 of 2022 REPRESENTED BY ITS SENIOR OFFICER LEGAL, SIR SATHYAMURTHY M CHETTY,S S/O S MAHADEVAN, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, BRANCH NO.603, E AND F BLOCK, ANIKETANA ROAD, KUVEMPUNAGAR, MYSURU -23. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. RAJIV R., ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORDS IN C.MISC.NO.93/2022 FROM THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, MYSURU WHICH ULTIMATELY RESULTED IN PASSING THE IMPUGNED ANNEXURE-A DATED: 20.04.2022 MADE IN CRL.MISC.NO.93/2022 BY THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, MYSURU. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ‘DISMISSAL’, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI ORAL ORDER The present writ petition is filed against Aptus Value Housing Finance India Ltd., which is a private Bank and in the light of the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Civil Appeal Nos.257-259/2022 between Phoenix ARC Private Limited Vs. Vishwa Bharathi Vidya Mandir and others - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19665 WP No. 9294 of 2022 arising out of WP.Nos.35564-35566/2015 dated 27.03.2018, the present writ petition is not maintainable against Aptus Value Housing Finance India Ltd., which is a private Bank. 2.When the matter came up on 07.04.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and the matter is directed to be listed under caption for ‘dismissal’ on 08.04.2026. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. In view of the same, this court is passing the following: ORDER i. The writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedy before the DRT. ii. Pending I.As. in the petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE TS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 56