HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15814 of 2026 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent nos.1 and 2 as well as Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.3-BSA. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed with the prayer to direct the respondent authorities to permit the petitioner to appear for counseling and treat the actual date of birth in place of date of birth which has been wrongly mentioned in the prescribed form and a further prayer to decide the representation/affidavit of the petitioner dated 29.01.2024, in accordance with law. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had earlier filed Writ-A No.4500 of 2024 (Arvind vs. State of U.P. And 2 Others) with nearly the same prayer. He further contends that the aforesaid writ petition was wrongly connected with the bunch of other writ petitions, which has been disposed of by order dated 09.04.2025 passed in Writ-A No.7962 of 2024 (Seema Sharma And 15 Others vs. State of U.P. And 2 Others), granting liberty to the petitioners therein to approach this Court after the final order is passed by the Apex Court where the issue was pending. He further submits that the petitioner may be permitted for counseling after correction in the date of birth as the selection proceedings pursuant to 12460 vacancies for the post Assistant Teachers as advertised, is still going on. 4. On the basis of instructions as passed on to the Court today, which are Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rakesh Bhushan Dubey, Shailesh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sanjay Kumar Singh Arvind .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) kept on record, learned counsel for respondent-BSA submits that as per the advertisement inviting applications from the candidates, time was granted from 17.01.2017 to 19.01.2017 for correcting any mistake made by them. He also contends that no such correction was made by the petitioner. Even after filing of the aforementioned writ petition, the petitioner did not approach the authorities concerned when the counseling was going on in the year 2023 for correction of his date of birth. He further submits that the selection proceedings have come to an end after the order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, therefore, the relief as prayed cannot be granted to the petitioner. 5. In view of the aforesaid, the instant writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. September 29, 2026 K.N. WRIA No. 15814 of 2026 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- KALP NATH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad