110 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10794-2026 Date of decision: April 18, 2026 NARESH MITTAL AND OTHERS ….Petitioners Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUVIR SEHGAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present: Mr. Krishan Kanha, Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Arundhati Kulshreshta, AAG, Punjab. Ms. Kavita Arora, Advocate for respondents No. 3 and 4. ***** SUVIR SEHGAL, J. (ORAL) 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh contempt petition. 2. Permission to withdraw the writ petition is granted. However, liberty is granted to the petitioners to take recourse to the remedy available to them in accordance with law. 3. Writ petition is, accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforementioned. (SUVIR SEHGAL) JUDGE (VIKAS SURI) April 18, 2026 JUDGE Rts Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No RITU SHARMA 2026.04.20 12:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document