BATTULA SATISH REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/26540/2026 · 2026-09-16
Subba Reddy Satti
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11329 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11329 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010486572026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE 17th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 26540/2026 Between:
1. BATTULA SATISH REDDY, EMPLOYEE, S/O. B.SUBBA REDDY, AGED.42 YEARS, RIO. VEERAPANENIGUDEM, GANNAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, AP-521286. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP-522238. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, AT MACHILIPATNAM, AP-521001. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, GANNAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, AP-521101. 4. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, VEERAPANENI GUDEM, GANNAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, AP-521286. 5. KAGITALA AMMESWARA RAO, S/O. JAGARNADHA RAO, AGED.65 YEARS, RIO. VEERAPANENIGUDEM, GANNAVARAM MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, AP-521286
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS Declaring the action of the Respondents in issuing the endorsement vide Proc. in RC.No.A338/2026, Dt.30-06-2026 illegal, unjust, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice, violative of Art 14,16 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and as such liable to be set aside, and consequently Direct the R-3 and 4 to remove the encroachers like R-5 from
the subject land to an extent of Ac 0.35 cents in LPM.No.1123 in Adngal Khata No.5073 and 5074 of Metlapalli Village, Gannavaram (M) forthwith IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Direct the R-3 and 4 to remove the encroachers like R-5 from the subject land to an extent of Ac 0.35 cents in LPM.No:1123 in Adngal Khata No: 5073 and 5074 of Metlapalli Village, Gannavaram(M) forthwith, pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. S M SUBHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order:
Sri S.M.Subhan, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Dated: 17.09.2026 JLV Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
73
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION No.26540 OF 2026
Dated: 17.09.2026 JLV