APHC010431212026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY, THE 21st DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 23684/2026 Between: 1. GOLLA BUDDANNA,, S/O. LATE GOLLA PEDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, GOLLA STREET, CHANUGONDLA VILLAGE, GUDUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI -522 238. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 518 001. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 518 001. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, GUDUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 518 466. 5. GOLLA VENKATA RAMUDU, S/O. LATE GOLLA PEDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, GOLLA STREET, CHANUGONDLA VILLAGE, GUDUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISRICT - 518 464. 6. G SAMADHI, S/O. LATE GOLLA PEDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, GOLLA STREET, CHANUGONDLA VILLAGE, GUDUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISRICT - 518 464 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toissue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the 4th respondent in contemplating to entertain mutation in favor of 3rd parties at the instance of respondents No. 5 and 6 in respect of lands in Sy.No. 625/3 to an extent of Ac. 2.78 cents, Sy.No. 620 to an extent of Ac. 10.24 cents and Sy.No. 618 to an extent of Ac. 4.80 cents situated at Chanugondla Village, Gudur Mandal, Kurnool District pending disposal of suit in 0.S.No. 430/2026 on the file of the court of Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool without considering the representations dated 30- 03-2026 and 06-08-2026 made by the petitioner, as highly illegal, arbitrary, and unjust and violative of Art. 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently DIRECT the respondent authorities not to entertain any mutation in favor of 3rd parties in respect of lands in Sy.No. 625/3 to an extent of Ac. 2.78 cents, Sy.No. 620 to an extent of Ac. 10.24 cents and Sy.No. 618 to an extent of Ac. 4.80 cents situated at Chanugondla Village, Gudur Mandal, Kurnool District pending disposal of suit in 0.S.No. 430/2026 on the file of the court of Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased DIRECT the respondents No. 3 and 4 to consider the representations dated 30-03-2026 and 06-08-2026 made by the petitioner, seeking not to enterain any mutation in favor 3rd parties in respect of lands in Sy.No. 625/3 to an extent of Ac. 2.78 cents, Sy.No. 620 to an extent of Ac. 10.24 cents and Sy.No. 618 to an extent of Ac. 4.80 cents situated at Chanugondla Village, Gudur Mandal, Kurnool District pending disposal of suit in 0.S.No. 430/2026 on the file of the court of Prl. Junior Civil Judge, Kurnool, pending disposal of above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BUTTA VIJAYA BHASKER Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. G SEKHAR REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER Heard Sri Butta Vijaya Bhasker Babu, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Divya Theja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents 1 to 4 and Sri G.Sekhar Reddy, learned counsel for the respondents 5 and 6. 2. The petitioner filed the above writ petition complaining that the 4th respondent failed to consider the representations dated 30.03.2026 and 06.08.2026 and entertaining mutation in favour of third parties, in respect of lands in S.No.625/3 to an extent of Ac.2.78 cents; S.No.620 to an extent of Ac.10.24 cents and S.No.618 to an extent of Ac.4.80 cents situated at Chanugondla village, Gudur Mandl, Kurnool District. 3. Sri Divya Theja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents 1 to 4, submitted the order passed by the 4th respondent- Tahsildar vide Rc.B.11/ROR/2025, dated 31.07.2026. A copy of the order is handed over to learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. 4. Since a speaking order was passed by the 4th respondent, the prayer sought in the writ petition is misconceived. In fact, the grievance of the petitioner is redressed. 5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is Closed. No order as to costs. However, this order will not preclude the petitioner from challenging the order passed by the 4th respondent vide Rc.B.11/ROR/2025, dated 31.07.2026, if he is aggrieved. As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI PVD