Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body
2026 DAILYLAW 11324 (PNJ)
SHAYAL v. STATE OF HARYANA
CRM-M/12657/2026 · 2026-04-30
Rupinderjit Chahal
body2026
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11324 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11324 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-12657-2026 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Sr.No.235 CRM-M-12657-2026 Decided on : 30.04.2026 Shayal ...... Petitioner
Versus State of Haryana ...... Respondent CORAM :
*** Present : Mr. Sandeep Singh Jattan, Advocate Ms. Sundeep Kaur, Advocate Ms. Varsha Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner.
.
*** , J (ORAL) ! " # # $%$ & '()" * %*$%$* $% ++ + ,$%-!(. ,/ 01 " $ ! & " &1 1 & . '() 2 " 2 2 " 2 '() 3 & 1 MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.01 14:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh CRM-M-12657-2026 2 2 3 2 & 4 2 & ( & & " & 1 15 %$%$* 5 1 & 1
3 &1 2 & 61 &1 2 # 1 2 & &# & &5 & 2 3 2 # 5 & 1 & & &1 11 & However, s petitioner is the first time offender as he is not involved in any other case.
* 1 %*1 78 8 1 8 8 & 1 8 2 & 61 1 # 1 MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.01 14:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh CRM-M-12657-2026 3 2 & & 2 & 2 & $ . ( + ) 9 1 2 :& 6. # 1 && & 1 1 & $. ( , ( 2 & 2 & & & & ; &
. ; ;./ ( & 6 1 1 <= 11 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No 4 & >0 ;" MAMTA MALHOTRA 2026.05.01 14:27 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment Chandigarh