Gunuturu Shaik Nayiba v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLRC/1279/2019 · 2026-09-21
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11321 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11321 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010412682019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1279/2019 Between:
1. GUNUTURU SHAIK NAYIBA, , S/O. CHINNA JOHN, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
2. GUNUTURU SHAIK SAIDA, , S/O. CHINNA JOHN, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
3. AMARAVATHI BUJJI @ HUSSAIN, , S/O. CHINA HASAN AHAMMAD AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
4. GUNUTURU SHAIK BURAN BI, W/O. SAIDA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
5. GUNUTURU SHAIK JANI BEGAM, , W/O. MAHABOOB SUBHANI, AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
6. GUNUTURU SHAIK SAIDA VALI, S/O. NAYIBA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
7. GUNUTURU SHAIK ALLABHAKSHU, SIO. NAYIBA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
8. GUNUTURU SHAIK BUDE, , S/O. NAYIBA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
9. GUNUTURU SHAIK JANI BASHA, , S/O. SAIDA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
10. GUNUTURU SHAIK BUDE, , S/O. SAIDA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
11. AMARAVATHI SHAIK HASSAN AHAMMAD, , S/O. CHINA HASSAN AHAMMAD, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
12. AMARAVATHI SHAIK MAHABOOB SUBHANI, , S/O. CHINA HASSAN AHAMMAD, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF
2
PINNELLI VILLAGE, MACHAVARAM MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI.
2. GUNTUR SHAIK SHAMEELA, CR. NO. 33/2015 OF MACHAVARAM PS
3. GUNTUR SHAIK GOUSE, CR NO.33 OF 2015 OF MACHAVARAM PS) (RR 2- 3 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER THE COURT'S ORDER DATED15.07.2026
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. S DILIP JAYA RAM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following:
ORDER
Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor.
Petitioners and unofficial Respondents are present.
Sri Rachuri Lakshmikar, learned Counsel is appointed as learned Mediator in this case and has submitted mediator’s report.
In view of the mediator’s report, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as compromised. Consequently, the conviction and sentence passed by the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Gurazala, in S.C.No.511 of 2015, dated 08.05.2018, as modified in Crl.A.No.170 of 2018, dated 04.12.2019, by the learned X Additional Sessions Judge, Gurazala, are set aside, as a result, the
3
Petitioner is acquitted under Section 320(8) of ‘the Cr.P.C.’ There shall be no
order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 22.09.2026 VTS