CRWP-389 IN 176 SURBHI S STATE OF CORAM: Present: MANISHA 1. Constitutio official resp at the han representati 2. submitted 01.04.2026 5) raising has not yet submitted t directions a Patiala to d necessary a 3890-2026 (O&M) (1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUN AT CHANDIG BHI SHARMA AND ANOTHER Versus TE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS AM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE **** Ms. Hasan Kaur, Advocate for Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D ISHA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been titution of India seeking issuance of a ial respondents No.2 to 3 to protect the e hands of respondents No.4 to sentation dated 01.04.2026 (Annexure At the very outset, learned itted that the petitioners have rec 2026 before the Senior Superintende ising their grievances as mentioned in ot yet been considered and no action h itted that at this stage, the petitioners tions are issued to respondent No.2 to decide the aforesaid representatio ssary action thereon. F PUNJAB AND HARYANA NDIGARH CRWP-3890-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.04.2026 ...Petitione ersus ...Responden ICE MANISHA BATRA ate for the petitioners , Sr. DAG, Punjab s been filed under Article 226 of th ce of a writ of mandamus directing th tect the life and liberty of the petitione to 5 and to take action on the nexure P-5). arned counsel for the petitioners ha e recently filed a representation o tendent of Police, Patiala (Annexure P ned in the present petition but the sam ction has been taken thereon. He furth ioners would be satisfied if appropria No.2-Senior Superintendent of Polic entation filed by the petitioners and tak .2026 titioners ondents of the ting the titioners n their ers has tion on exure P- he same further ropriate Police, and take AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.06 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-3 3. 4. on behalf o in due cour the course o 5. commentin disposed of aforesaid re within a p accordance petitioners, order to pro 06.04.2026 Amit Sharma Whe Whe 3890-2026 (O&M) -2- Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D ehalf of the respondents-State and sub e course. Let a complete set of the pap ourse of the day. In view of the limited prayer enting anything on the merits of t sed of at this stage with a direction said representation dated 01.04.2026 in a period of 15 days from today, rdance with law. Needless to say, ioners, the official respondents would p r to protect their life and liberty. .2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Ye Whether reportable Ye , Sr. DAG, Punjab, has advance notic d submits that the needful will be don the paperbook be supplied to her durin rayer made by the petitioners, witho ts of the case, the present petition ction to respondent No.2 to decide th .2026 (Annexure P-5) of the petitione oday, by passing a speaking order say, if any threat is found to th ould provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No e notice be done during without tition is cide the titioners order in to the curity in AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.06 18:00 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.