APHC010462122026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY, THE 16th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 25086/2026 Between: 1. PAASUPU SRINIVASA RAO, S/O ADINARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O DOOR NO. 5-21, KAMBALA PETA, BANTUPALLI PANCHAYAT,RANASTHALAM MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT,532407 ANDHRA PRADESH.PIN 532407 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522538 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, VIZIANAGARAM.535003 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VIZIANAGARAM DIVISION, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.53500 4. THE TAHSILDAR, BHOGAPURAM MANDAL, BHOGAPURAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.535216 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BHOGAPURAM POLICE STATION,BHOGAPURAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.PIN 535216 6. ERUPALLI PEDDA SANYASI, S/O (LATE) SANYASI, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O KONGAVANIPALEM VILLAGE, BHOGAPURAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.PIN 535216 7. ERUPALLI NADIPI SANYASI, S/O (LATE) SANYASI, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, - RIO KONGAVANIPALEM VILLAGE, BHOGAPURAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 535216 8. ERUPALLI CHINNA SANYASI, S/O (LATE) SANYASI, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RIO KONGAVANIPALEM VILLAGE, BHOGAPURAM MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 535216 9. ERUPALLI POLAYYA, S/O (LATE) CHEVITODU, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O NEAR WEST ICE FACTORY, BHOGAPURAM, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.PIN 535216 10. GARE SRINIVASA RAO, S/O (LATE) CHINNA RAMANA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,R/O GARE NANDIGAM, BHOGAPURAM MANDAL,VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.PIN 535216 11. GARE VENKATA APPARAO, S/O (LATE) PEDDA VENKATARAMANA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,R/O PATA MADHURAWADA METTA, BHEEMILI RURAL,VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 535216 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS DECLARING the action of Respondents No. 4 and 5 in continuously interfering with the Petitioner's peaceful possession, enjoyment, and agricultural operations in respect of the land measuring Ac. 1.46 Cents in Survey No. 60-1 (LPM 2322) and Ac.0.85 Cents in Survey No. 61-1 (LPM 549) under Khata No.3123 in Kongavanipalem Village, Bhogapuram Mandal, at the instigation and behest of Respondents No.6 to 11 as highly illegal, arbitrary, high-handed, without jurisdiction, and violative of Articles 14, 21, and 300-A of the Constitution of India Consequently restraining Respondents No. 4 and 5, their agents, subordinates, or anyone acting on their behalf, from interfering with the Petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject land, or attempting to dispossess the Petitioner except by following due process of law IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Respondents No.4 and 5 not to interfere with the Petitioner's peaceful possession, enjoyment, and agricultural activities over the subject land measuring Ac.1.46 Cents in Survey No.60-1 and Ac.0.85 Cents in Survey No.61-1 of Kongavanipalem Village, Bhogapuram Mandal, Vizianagaram District, and pass such further order or orders pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M. SAPTHAGIRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: Heard Sri M.Sapthagiri, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Divya Teja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, for respondents 1 to 4. The notice in respect of respondents 6 to 11 is dispensed with since no adverse order has been passed affecting their rights or interests. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that respondents 4 and 5 are attempting to dispossess the petitioner from an extent of Ac.1.46 cents in Sy.No.60-1 and Ac.0.85 cents in Sy.No.61-1 of Kongavanipalem Village, Bhogapuram Mandal, Vizianagaram District, without following due procedure. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of the aforementioned property. The name of the petitioner was updated in the Record of Rights. Copies of ROR -1B Adangals are filed as Ex.P.1 to 3, and a registered document dated 29.12.2020 is filed as Ex.P5. Learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that respondents 4 and 5 are attempting to dispossess the petitioner from the aforementioned property, without issuing any notice. 4. Sri Divya Teja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, submitted the instructions of the 4th respondent and submitted that the 4th respondent is not interfering with the aforementioned property. Page 4 of 5 5. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, without going into the merits of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of, at the stage of admission, with the consent of both the learned counsel, directing the 4th respondent not to interfere with an extent of Ac.1.46 cents in Sy.No.60-1 and Ac.0.85 cents in Sy.No.61-1 of Kongavanipalem Village, Bhogapuram Mandal, Vizianagaram District without following due procedure. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 16.09.2026 SNI 203 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 25086 OF 2026 Date: 16.09.2026 SNI