Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 11306 (PNJ)

MANOJ KUMAR v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/47540/2024 · 2026-04-29

Mandeep Pannu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

255 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA MANOJ KUMAR STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Navraj Singh Mahal, DAG, Pu MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) After arguing for some time, learned counsel f submits that he does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be dismissed as withdrawn Ordered accordingly. All pending applications, if any 29.04.2026 himanshu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH MANOJ KUMAR VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Navraj Singh Mahal, DAG, Punjab. MANDEEP PANNU, J (ORAL) After arguing for some time, learned counsel f e does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be dismissed as withdrawn. Ordered accordingly. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CRM-M-47540-2024 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 29.04.2026 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Mr. Atul Kumar, Advocate for the petitioner. njab. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner e does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be , also stand disposed of. (MANDEEP PANNU) JUDGE or the petitioner e does not want to pursue the present petition and the same be HIMANSHU 2026.04.29 18:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document