Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010133962026 2026:GAU-AS:10329 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./1763/2026 RAJA ALI ALIAS SONO AND 3 ORS S/O- LATE RAJIB ALI, R/O- CHAWALKHUWA GHORBANDI CHUK, P.S.- DIBRUGARH, DIST- DIBRUGARH, ASSAM. 2: ALFAZ HUSSAIN ALIAS ARFAZ S/O- SAJID HUSSAIN R/O- NIZ MOIDUMIYA MOHANBARI P.S.- LAHOWAL DIST- DIBRUGARH ASSAM. 3: ARMAN ALI ALIAS IRFAN S/O-SAFI ALI R/O- CHAWALKHUWA GHORBANDI CHUK P.S.- DIBRUGARH DIST- DIBRUGARH ASSAM. 4: RAJIB GOGOI ALIAS NIPUL S/O- BUDHON GOGOI R/O- KHUMTAI P.S.- MORAN DIST- DIBRUGARH ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY P.P. ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S M ABDULLAH P, MR. MD IMDAD,MD IMRAN,MD R ISLAM,MS F HUSSAIN Page No.# 2/3 Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR A H SARKAR(INFORMANT),G UDDIN(INFORMANT) BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 28-07-20 26 Heard Mr. S.M. Abdullah P, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. M.P. Goswami, learned Additional P.P. for the State. Also heard Mr. G. Uddin, learned counsel for the respondent No.2. 2. This is an application under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 in connection with Dibrugarh P.S. Case No. 103/2026, under Sections 112(2)/109(2)/3(5) of the BNS read with Section 25(1A) of the Arms Act, for release on bail of the accused/petitioners, namely, (i) Raja Ali @ Sono; (ii) Alfaz Hussain @ Arfaz; (iii) Arman Ali @ Irfan and (iv) Rajib Gogoi @ Nipul who were arrested on 04.06.2026 and 07.06.2026 respectively. 3. The gist of accusation in this case is that on 11.04.2026, one Ijaz Ahmed had lodged an FIR before the Officer-in-charge of Dibrugarh Police Station, inter alia, alleging that on 11.04.2026 at about 10:30 AM when the first informant's younger brother, namely, Abid Ali was going to shop for purchasing some household items, suddenly Abdul Mintu Ali, Rinku Ali, Sono Ali and Alfaz Ali started firing at him with pistol/revolver. As a result of which, the younger brother of the first informant sustained injuries on his left eye. It is further alleged in the FIR that later on some other persons including the present petitioners assaulted the first informant and his father when they reached at that place. Page No.# 3/3 4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the main accused of the case is Abdul Minto Ali, who alleged to have fired the Pistol injuring the victim and the present petitioners had no role in the aforesaid Act. 5. The learned counsel appearing for the informant has opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that all the persons named in the FIR are involved in the offence. 6. Upon perusal of the case diary, it appears that the principal role is attributed to the accused Abdul Minto Ali, who has been arrested subsequently, after he was granted interim pre-arrest bail. 7. Having regard to the materials available in the case diary, it may not be necessary to recall the interim bail granted to the petitioners. 8. Accordingly, the prayer for interim bail is allowed. 9. The order of interim bail dated 26.06.2026 is hereby made absolute on the same terms and conditions. 10. This bail application accordingly stands disposed of. 11. Return the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant