[2026:RJ-JP:38239] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7326/2026 CNR: RJHC010817492026 | URN: CRLMP / 12646U / 2026 Meihvish Siddiqui W/o Imran Khan, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Tower A 1505, Paramount Emotions, Bisrakh Jalalpur, Near Yatharth Hospital, Noida Extension, Sector- 1, District Gautam Buddha Nagar, Uttar Pradesh- 201306 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, S.h.o. Police Station Shergarh, Jodhpur Rural, Rajasthan 342022 2. The Branch Manager, Sbi Bank, Branch Office- Bisrakh Jalalpur, Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh 3. Dig Cyber Crime, Police Headquarters, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Nain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR Order 10/08/2026 1. The instant criminal misc. petition under Section 528 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs:- “a. That the respondents be directed to release the entire amount lying in the Savings Bank Account No. 30274389920 (IFSC code SBIN0012987) of the Petitioner maintained with State Bank of India, Branch- Bisrakh Jalalpur, Gautam Budh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh and restore full operational facilities, including withdrawal, without any hindrance; b. That the respondent bank be directed to pay damages and compensation for the mental agony and economic loss suffered by the petitioner. c. That the respondent bank be directed to retain only the disputed amount, if any, and permit the petitioner to operate the remaining balance in his account without any restrictions. d. That any other appropriate order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this criminal [2026:RJ-JP:38239] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7326/2026] misc. petition with a direction to the SBI Bank (Respondent No.2) to keep the disputed amount (the amount which was transferred illegally in the bank account of the petitioner) frozen and allow the petitioner to make transactions from her bank account from the remaining balance. 3. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent – Bank has not received the information regarding the exact figure of the disputed amount, which the Investigating Officer/Police alleges to be receipt(s) of the offence, the bank shall send a communication to the concerned Investigating Officer/Police, to indicate the amount to be earmarked for lien, while endorsing a copy of the instant order. 4. Upon receipt of such communication/letter, the concerned Investigating Officer/Police shall be under an obligation to apprise the respondent - Bank about the amount to be kept in lien, within a period of seven days of receiving the communication from the respondent - Bank. The respondent – bank shall thereafter do the needful as directed herein above. 5. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent-Bank does not receive any reply from the concerned Investigating Officer/Police, then it shall be duty bound to act in accordance with the instant order. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the instant criminal misc. petition is disposed of. 7. Stay petition as well as all pending application, if any, stand disposed of. (KULDEEP MATHUR),J 286/Sonia/694