Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1130 (JHR)

M/S ANJANEYA ISPAT LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SRI UDAY SINGH v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/5544/2025 · 2026-03-16

Rajesh Shankar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:7017-DB 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No.5544 of 2025 ----- M/s. Anjaneya Ispat Ltd., a public Limited Company, through its Director Sri Uday Singh, s/o Ram Bahadur Singh, R/o H. No.29 Rain Basera Colony, Sanjay Nagar, Adityapur, Seraikela- Kharsawan, Jharkhand .......... Petitioner. -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Superintendent, (Anti Evasion), (CGST & CX), CGST & Central Excise Headquarters, P.O. & P.S. Bistupur, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand. 3. Joint Commissioner (CGST & CX), office of the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Outer Circle Road, Bistupur, Jamshedpur. .......... Respondents. ----- CORAM : HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Das, Advocate For the CGST : Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Advocate ----- Order No.03 Date: 16.03.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Mr. A.K. Das, the learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing the matter for sometime, sought leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail of the alternate remedy of appeal to question the impugned order dated 17th June, 2025. 3. We grant leave with liberty as prayed for. 4. Further, Mr. Das, on instructions, stated that the appeal would be instituted within six weeks from today after complying with all statutory requirements. If the appeal is indeed instituted within six weeks after complying with all statutory requirements, the appellate authority must consider the appeal on merits and in accordance with law without adverting to the issue of limitation. This is because this petition was instituted well within the 2026:JHHC:7017-DB 2 limitation period prescribed for filing appeals and the petitioner was bona fide pursuing this matter before this Court. 5. All contentions of the parties on merits are left explicitly open to be decided by the appellate authority at the first instance. 6. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of as withdrawn with liberty in the above terms. No costs. (M. S. Sonak, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) 16th March, 2026 Sanjay/Rohit Uploaded on 17.03.2026