VIKKY YADAV @ AJAY KUMAR YADAV v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./6911/2026 · 2026-02-24
Sandeep Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11299 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 11299 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6911 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-218 Year-2025 Thana- DARBHANGA SADAR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Vikky Yadav @ Ajay Kumar Yadav Son Of Vijay Kumar Yadav Resident Of Village - Sundarpur, Alinagar, Police Station - L.N.M.U., District - Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Nilendu Kumar Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Bishweshwar Ram ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 24-02-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned counsel for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 218 of 2025 registered for offences under Sections 109 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. Allegedly, on the fateful day, while the informant, who is said to be an employee at the bus stand, was sitting in a tea shop, 5–6 persons arrived at 2–3 motorcycles and started firing indiscriminately. However, the informant somehow managed to save himself.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6911 of 2026(2) dt.24-02-2026 2/2 He further submits that the petitioner is not named in the FIR; however, during the course of the investigation, the name of the petitioner has come. It is also an admitted fact that no one sustained any injury in the incident.
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this application for anticipatory bail stands allowed.
7. Accordingly, let the petitioner, above-named, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today in the Court below, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 218 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
Shishir/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T