2026:JHHC:4623 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.10412 of 2025 ----- Dipu Kumar Mandal @ Dipak Kumar Mandal @ Dipak Mandal, son of Kanta Mandal, resident of village Chamliti, PO and PS Ahilyapur, District Giridih … Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party(s). With B.A. No.10601 of 2025 ----- Chhoti Mandal @ Chhote Mandal, son of Gobind Mandal, resident of village Chamliti, PO and PS Ahilyapur, District Giridih… Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party(s). With B.A. No.10833 of 2025 ----- Shravan Kumar @ Sharvan Kumar Ray @ Sharvan Ray, son of Sanjay Ray, resident of village Maheshpur, PO Dwarpahari, PS Giridih(M), District Giridih … Petitioner(s). Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. R. S. Mazumdar, Advocate Mr. Nishant Roy, Advocate Mr. Prashant Kr. Rai, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl. PP Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, APP …...... 03 /17.02.2026: These bail applications have been filed under Sections 483 & 484 of BNSS, 2023 wherein, prayer has been made for grant of bail as they are in custody for allegedly committing offence punishable under Sections 317(4), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2), 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) of the Information Technology Act. 2. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the State and have also gone through the impugned order. 3. Learned APP opposes the prayer for bail. 2026:JHHC:4623 2 4. There is allegation against these petitioners that they used to commit cyber fraud by calling and sending links to people pretending to be bank officials. 5. After hearing the parties and after going through the record, especially the impugned order, I find that the mobile phones and SIM cards were recovered from the petitioners. False logos of various banks and payment Apps, APK files of various Banks and KYC etc. were found. Further, many serial calls, messages, WhatsApp chats and money transactions with bank customers which shows their involvement in cyber-crime. 6. Considering the aforesaid fact, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioners in connection with Giridih Cyber PS Case No. 26 of 2025, pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II cum Special Judge (Cyber Crime), Giridih stands rejected. 7. Accordingly, these bail applications are dismissed. 8. The petitioners are at liberty to renew their prayer for grant of bail, after framing of the charge. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 17.02.2026 Tanuj/CP-2 Uploaded on 21.02.2026