APHC010152552012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE 16th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 34756 OF 2012 Between: 1. The Public Information Officer-cum-Principal, C.S.R., Sarma College, Ongole Prakasam District. 2. Dr. V. L. Kanakarao,, S/o. Sri Lingaiah, Aged about 60 years, Principal (Retired), C.S.R. Sarma College, Ongole, Prakasam District. 3. Dr. R.V. Subrahmanyam,, S/o. R. Nageswara Sastry, Aged about 59 years, Principal (Retired), C.S.R. Sarma College, Ongole, Prakasam District. ...Petitioners AND 1. A P Information Commission, rep. by its Registrar, HACA Bhavan, Hyderabad. 2. N Brahmaiah, S/o. Venkateshwarlu, Flat No.201, Park Avenue Apartments, Bhagyanagar, 3rd Lane, Ongole, Prakasam District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1St respondent in passing the proceedings in Case No.11516/SIC-SPR/2010, 2 dt.15-10-2012 directing the 1St petitioner to furnish the information ought for by the 2" respondent herein within ten days and further directing the petitioners 2 and 3 herein to show cause for not furnishing the information to the 2" respondent and asking them to alvear on 14.11.2012 is illegal, arbitrary, highhanded, innocuous, misconceived and violative of the provisions of Right to Information Act and consequently direct the 1St respondent not to initiate any further action in pursuance of proceedings in Case No.11516/SIC- SPR/2010, dt.15- 10-2012 and pass such other order or orders as this Hontble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 44205 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings in Case No.11516/SIC-SPR/2010, dt.15-10-2012 issued by the 13t respondent, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners: ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI,Y V RAVI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondents: G SESHADRI(SC FOR MPP ZPP) Counsel for the Respondents:MADHAVA RAO NALLURI Counsel for the Respondents:G VENKATA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents:KAMBHAMPATI RAMESH BABU( SC FOR AP INFORMATION COMMISSION) The Court made the following 3 ORDER: Today, when the matter came up for hearing, Mr.Hari Chandra Aditya, learned counsel representing Mr.Y.V. Ravi Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners stated that no further cause survives in this matter and that the matter has become infructuous. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 16.09.2026 KGR/APSK