2026:JHHC:5619 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 562 of 2026 --------- Belonti Buruly @ Deka, aged About – 31 years, Wife of Yudhishthir Buruly, resident of – Village-Mahali Pokhar. P.O. Balibandh, P.S. Majhgaon, District-Singhbhum West, Jharkhand. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Kumar Upadhyay, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Achinto Sen, A.P.P. --------- 02/Dated:-25.02.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 103(1), 238, 3(5), 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 118(1), 118(2) of B.N.S., 2023 and subsequently charges framed under Section 333, 3(5), 127(2), 3(5), 115(2), 3(5), 103(1), 3(5), 238(a) and 238(b) of B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 03/04 of the Jharkhand Prevention of the Witch (Daain) Practices Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and nothing has been recovered either from the possession or on the statement of the petitioner. He further submits that two of the co-accused persons namely Kripa Sindhu Buriuly and Naveen Biruly have already been granted bail in B.A. No.10314 of 2025 and the petitioner for no offence has been languishing in custody since 29.04.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegations made against this petitioner coupled with the fact that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and the co-accused persons have already been granted bail; therefore, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-II cum Special Judge, POCSO Act Cases, West Singhbum at Chaibasa in connection with Majhgaon P.S. Case No. 26/2024 corresponding to G.R. Case No.211/2025 (S.T. Case No.234/2025). 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) FEBRUARY 25, 2026 vikas/- uploaded 26.02.2026